Subject
Research Seminar in Historical Linguistics and Typology III: New Perspectives
General details of the subject
- Mode
- Face-to-face degree course
- Language
- English
Description and contextualization of the subject
The study of language contact is of crucial importance to our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of language. A fundamental process and result of contact-induced language change is borrowing, which has rightly been considered one of the principal sources of language change, along with sound change and analogy. The Romance languages have the potential to contribute substantially to the study of language contact, thanks to a wide geospatial distribution, a long history of contact with several typologically as diverse languages as Nahuatl and Arabic, and abundant diachronic records. This course outlines contact-induced grammatical change and provides a critical assessment of the state-of-the-art in research on borrowing as a key mechanism of contact-induced language change and variation. The course’s empirical focus is on Romance and non-Romance languages spoken in the Romance linguistic landscape. Topics include innovative and conservative effects; processes of Romancization vs De-Romancization; matter borrowing vs pattern borrowing; case studies on phonological, prosodic, morphological and syntactic borrowing; and a critical evaluation of borrowability hierarchies.Teaching staff
Name | Institution | Category | Doctor | Teaching profile | Area | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGARTUA UGARTE, IVAN | University of the Basque Country | Profesorado Catedratico De Universidad | Doctor | Bilingual | Slavic Philology | ivan.igartua@ehu.eus |
HASPELMATH ., MARTIN ROBERT | Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig | Otros | Doctor |
Competencies
Name | Weight |
---|---|
Capacidad para comprender y analizar los efectos del cambio lingüístico desde perspectivas novedosas que incluyen nuevas herramientas descriptivas y explicativas. | 34.0 % |
Capacidad para aplicar las nuevas perspectivas sobre la evolución lingüística al análisis de problemas concretos. | 33.0 % |
Capacidad para la elaboración de reseñas críticas de trabajos lingüísticos que tratan sobre el cambio lingüístico desde perspectivas innovadoras. | 33.0 % |
Study types
Type | Face-to-face hours | Non face-to-face hours | Total hours |
---|---|---|---|
Lecture-based | 18 | 0 | 18 |
Applied classroom-based groups | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Applied computer-based groups | 0 | 45 | 45 |
Training activities
Name | Hours | Percentage of classroom teaching |
---|---|---|
Exercises | 0.0 | 0 % |
Expositive classes | 30.0 | 100 % |
Readings | 45.0 | 0 % |
Assessment systems
Name | Minimum weighting | Maximum weighting |
---|---|---|
Attendance and participation | 30.0 % | 30.0 % |
Essay, Individual work and/or group work | 70.0 % | 70.0 % |
Temary
Day 11.1 Language change through language contact
1.2 Effects of language contact
Day 2
2.1 Borrowing
2.2 Types: Matter borrowing and pattern borrowing
Day 3
3.1 Phonological borrowing
3.2 Prosodic borrowing
Day 4
4.1 Morphological borrowing
4.2 Syntactic borrowing
Day 5
5.1 The upper limits of borrowing
5.2 Verification of borrowability scales
Bibliography
Basic bibliography
Dahl, Ö., 2004, The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.In-depth bibliography
Baerman, M, Brown, D., G. G. Corbett (eds.), 2015, Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Carstairs-McCarthy, A., 1999, The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables and Truth. Oxford: OUP.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A., 2010, The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A., 2012, "The evolutionary relevance of more and less complex forms of language". In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: OUP, 2012, 469¿78.
E. C. Traugott, G. Trousdale, Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: OUP.
Trudgill, P., 2011, Sociolinguistic Typology. The Social Determinants of Language Change. Oxford: OUP.
Stump, G., R. Finkel, 2013, Morphological Typology: From Word to Paradigm, Cambridge: CUP.
Journals
DiachronicaLanguage dynamics and change
Language
Linguistic Typology
Lingua