Logical Consequence for Nominalists

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 01-05-2009
DOI https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.440
Marcus Rossberg Daniel Cohnitz

Abstract

It is often claimed that nominalistic programmes to reconstruct mathematics fail, since they will at some point involve the notion of logical consequence which is unavailable to the nominalist. In this paper we use an idea of Goodman and Quine to develop a nominalistically acceptable explication of logical consequence.

How to Cite

Rossberg, M., & Cohnitz, D. (2009). Logical Consequence for Nominalists. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 24(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.440
Abstract 585 | PDF Downloads 775

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Philosophy of mathematics, nominalism, logical consequence, inferentialism, Nelson Goodman, W.V. Quine

Issue
Vol. 24 No. 2 (2009): Construction and Reduction: New Essays in Honour of Nelson Goodman
Section
MONOGRAPHIC SECTION

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.