Subject
Product life cycle management
General details of the subject
- Mode
- Mixta
- Language
- English
Description and contextualization of the subject
Using Life Cycle Thinking/life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Engineering Projects. Benefits. Basic calculations using software opeLCA. Applications to different areas. Practicing LCATeaching staff
Name | Institution | Category | Doctor | Teaching profile | Area | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITURRONDOBEITIA ELLACURIA, MAIDER | University of the Basque Country | Profesorado Agregado | Doctor | Bilingual | Graphic Expression in Engineering | maider.iturrondobeitia@ehu.eus |
OTEGI OLASO, JOSE RAMON | University of the Basque Country | Profesorado Agregado | Doctor | Bilingual | Engineering Projects | joserra.otegi@ehu.eus |
TOLEDO GANDARIAS, NEREA | University of the Basque Country | Profesorado Pleno | Doctor | Bilingual | Engineering Projects | nerea.toledo@ehu.eus |
Competencies
Name | Weight |
---|---|
Apply the theories of product design and its life cycle | 50.0 % |
To apply the tools and techniques used for the sustainable management of projects | 50.0 % |
Study types
Type | Face-to-face hours | Non face-to-face hours | Total hours |
---|---|---|---|
Lecture-based | 10 | 10 | 20 |
Applied classroom-based groups | 20 | 15 | 35 |
Applied computer-based groups | 0 | 20 | 20 |
Training activities
Name | Hours | Percentage of classroom teaching |
---|---|---|
Exercises | 15.0 | 10 % |
Expositive classes | 30.0 | 33 % |
Groupwork | 30.0 | 10 % |
Assessment systems
Name | Minimum weighting | Maximum weighting |
---|---|---|
Attendance and participation | 10.0 % | 30.0 % |
Drawing up reports and presentations | 30.0 % | 50.0 % |
Presentations | 25.0 % | 45.0 % |
Written examination | 15.0 % | 35.0 % |
Learning outcomes of the subject
At the end of the course, students must have made adequate progress in the development of the following skills:- Understand the current environmental problems associated with products and services.
- Define the life cycle concept and identify the phases of the life cycle of a product
- Describe the fundamentals and regulations of the Life Cycle Analysis
- Understand evaluation methodologies and software tools for product life cycle analysis
Ordinary call: orientations and renunciation
The evaluation of the subject is carried out continuously throughout the academic year. The finale grade of the subject takes into account the following factors: Attendance (30%): Although attendance is not mandatory, it is highly recommended.. Individual and / or group work (55%): students must submit a work assigned at the beginning of the lesson. The work will be delivered by uploading it to Egela within the specified deadlines. In order to pass the subject, the work must obtain a grade of 5 out of 10. Exam (15%): In order to pass the subject, the student must obtain a minimum grade of 4 out of 10. The weight corresponding to each factor (attendance, individual-team work, examination) will be applied. If one of the works (individual or in group) has not passed the established cut-off mark, the final grade of the subject will not be submitted. If the exam grade is below 4.0, the final grade for the lesson will be the same as the exam grade. If the student decides to waive the Continuous Assessment of this subject, must notify in writing way before the last day for the submission of the work. You will find this date in eGela platform. In this case, to pass the lesson, the student will be assessed through a written exam. In this exam, in addition to those posed in the exam conducted by the continuously assessed students, other questions may also be included, and all the content learned in the corresponding term of the call will be included. This assessment will be completed with an oral examination, which will take place on the day of the written examination, after requesting an appointment from the students who have registered for this call. In the oral exam, students will answear questions related to the content learned in the classroom, as well as about the activities done in class. The student will have to pass two tests to pass the lesson. If the health conditions prevent the teaching activity or face-to-face assessment, an online modality will be activated and students will be informed(applicable to all calls: regular, extraordinary and progress).
Extraordinary call: orientations and renunciation
Those who have to sit the extraordinary call will do so in the same way as they did in the ordinary call. In other words, those who took the continuous assessment will complete the tests (individual/team work, exam) that they did not pass in the ordinary call.The grade for the course will be obtained by applying the corresponding weight to each of the factors (attendance, individual/team work, exam). If any of the work (individual/team work) has not passed the established cut-off mark, the final mark for the course will be No Show.
If the exam mark is lower than 4.0, the final mark for the course will be that corresponding to the exam mark.
Those who waive the continuous assessment, will be submitted to a written and oral exam as described in the previous section (Ordinary call: orientations and waiver).
Temary
Introduction to the Life Cycle Thinking theory. Introduction to the concept of Life Cycle and the implications for the designers and Engineering projects. LCA methodology, based in UNE-EN ISO 14040 and UNE-EN-ISO14044 standards. Use of software to carry out LCA.Bibliography
Compulsory materials
Slides uploaded to eGela.Basque Ecodesign Center. Obsolescencia programada: ¿mito o realidad?. Cuaderno de Ideas nº6. Gobierno Vasco, 2014.
Doménech-Quesada J.L., Huella ecológica y desarrollo sostenible. AENOR, 2007.
Gestión ambiental: Análisis del ciclo de vida. Principios y marco de referencia. UNE-EN ISO 14040. Madrid. AENOR, 2006
Global Footprint Network, Ecological Footprint Accounting: Building a Winning Hand. Global Footprint Network, 2007.
Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. Life Cycle Initiative. UNEP SETAC, 2015.
Recomendación de la Comisión de 9 de abril de 2013 sobre el uso de métodos comunes para medir y comunicar el comportamiento ambiental de los productos y las organizaciones a lo largo de su ciclo de vida (2013/179/EU). Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas, 2013.
Basic bibliography
Basque Ecodesign Center. Obsolescencia programada: ¿mito o realidad?. Cuaderno de Ideas nº6. Gobierno Vasco, 2014.Doménech-Quesada J.L., Huella ecológica y desarrollo sostenible. AENOR, 2007.
Etiquetas ecológicas y declaraciones ambientales. Principios generales. UNE-EN ISO 14020. Madrid. AENOR, 2002
Gestión ambiental: Análisis del ciclo de vida. Principios y marco de referencia. UNE-EN ISO 14040. Madrid. AENOR, 2006
Global Footprint Network, Ecological Footprint Accounting: Building a Winning Hand. Global Footprint Network, 2007.
Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. Life Cycle Initiative. UNEP SETAC, 2015.
Ihobe - Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental. Etiquetado ambiental de producto. Guía de criterios ambientales para la mejora de producto. Gobierno Vasco, 2011.
Recomendación de la Comisión de 9 de abril de 2013 sobre el uso de métodos comunes para medir y comunicar el comportamiento ambiental de los productos y las organizaciones a lo largo de su ciclo de vida (2013/179/EU). Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas, 2013.
In-depth bibliography
Braungart M., McDonough W. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.Ihobe - Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental. Etiquetado ambiental de producto. La declaración ambiental de producto. Un instrumento de información y comparación ambiental entre productos. Gobierno Vasco, 2015.
Journals
Journal of Cleaner Production - ElsevierJournal of Management and Sustainability | CCSE
Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment - Springer Journal
Links
http://www.aenor.eshttps://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
http://www.ihobe.eus
http://www.iso.org